“If there is any issue related to Sean Combs that represents a risk to high-profile celebrity democrats (likely), the presence of the FBI would be to protect the interests of the political leverage the connection represents.
In historically accurate terms, the FBI would be covering, controlling, shaping and mitigating the risk in favor of those most politically useful to the government. Those of lesser value would be left exposed to the legal consequences of their perversions.”
Rhetorical question right?
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/09/24/sean-combs-body-guard-claims-music-mogul-kept-tapes-of-new-york-politicians-at-sex-parties/
sundance:
“If there is any issue related to Sean Combs that represents a risk to high-profile celebrity democrats (likely), the presence of the FBI would be to protect the interests of the political leverage the connection represents.
In historically accurate terms, the FBI would be covering, controlling, shaping and mitigating the risk in favor of those most politically useful to the government. Those of lesser value would be left exposed to the legal consequences of their perversions.”
Ha…so they nailed him to control him
Probably the same with the Routh Kid