A lot of people sent me this heated exchange between General Flynn & Dave from X22 and asked for my opinion.
I don’t see anyone else talking about this, so I will.
First, General Flynn is 100% correct:
• Our military abides by the US Constitution
• Our military acts on the orders of the duly elected
• To ask our military to do anything else, outside of the Constitution, we might as well live in a banana republic.
I agree 100% and we don’t want that
However; Joe Biden and many others were not “Duly Elected”…
If all legal & judicial avenues are exhausted.. and the process to duly elect said individuals is compromised, and our Constitution is being constantly eroded & disregarded — is that not a fair question to ask?
I personally did not like like how Flynn responded to Dave… I felt it was an unnecessary reaction.
In my opinion, General Flynn message is spot on, but would be highly more effective if he didn’t belittle & call people dummies, especially anons; who have been there supporting him since day 1.
The reality is, Flynn will never admit to the legitimacy of Q or what is said. I would never expect him to. You shouldn’t either. He’s a public figure, whom I think may serve in Trumps administration.
Here’s the rub, we don’t need him to… I know what Q means to me because I’ve read the drops & I’ve formulated my opinion about it. It changed my perspective on life forever and I’m not the only one.
I’ve seen what kinds of people Q has woken up and the domino effect it has had on the world.
If Q was intended to be a bad psyop, it wasn’t a very successful one, because Q effectively woke up & activated millions of people to become voices, to take action, get involved, and battle the main stream mockinbird apparatus narrative.
In a nutshell, I agree with & support Flynn on what he’s trying to say… but friendly fire like this is unwarranted and doesn’t do anyone any good.
There are more effective ways to talk about this subject without demeaning some of the most loyal people there are to the truth. Digital soldiers.
With that said, those are my thoughts. I still respect & appreciate his service to this country.
While the interviewer needs to be respectful after the first minute of Flynn making his point… it MUST be asked – “so do you think Biden was duly elected? and (I’d continue if I were the host) >> if so, what are the obligations of officers to the administration? – is ‘resign en mass’ the only option?”
If a military officer believes in their heart the country is being led by a successful ‘elite capture’ strategy, what is their duty to the country and it’s citizens?
I’m sure that was just a snipit of the interview, but I would like to hear interviewers that are knowledgeable on the subject challenge their guests and not let them pontificate (not like Hannity of course, running over guests with their own diatribe). In a ‘normal’ world I get what Flynn is saying but damn, let’s get to the REALITY of our current situation !
A lot of people sent me this heated exchange between General Flynn & Dave from X22 and asked for my opinion.
I don’t see anyone else talking about this, so I will.
First, General Flynn is 100% correct:
• Our military abides by the US Constitution
• Our military acts on the orders of the duly elected
• To ask our military to do anything else, outside of the Constitution, we might as well live in a banana republic.
I agree 100% and we don’t want that
However; Joe Biden and many others were not “Duly Elected”…
If all legal & judicial avenues are exhausted.. and the process to duly elect said individuals is compromised, and our Constitution is being constantly eroded & disregarded — is that not a fair question to ask?
I personally did not like like how Flynn responded to Dave… I felt it was an unnecessary reaction.
In my opinion, General Flynn message is spot on, but would be highly more effective if he didn’t belittle & call people dummies, especially anons; who have been there supporting him since day 1.
The reality is, Flynn will never admit to the legitimacy of Q or what is said. I would never expect him to. You shouldn’t either. He’s a public figure, whom I think may serve in Trumps administration.
Here’s the rub, we don’t need him to… I know what Q means to me because I’ve read the drops & I’ve formulated my opinion about it. It changed my perspective on life forever and I’m not the only one.
I’ve seen what kinds of people Q has woken up and the domino effect it has had on the world.
If Q was intended to be a bad psyop, it wasn’t a very successful one, because Q effectively woke up & activated millions of people to become voices, to take action, get involved, and battle the main stream mockinbird apparatus narrative.
In a nutshell, I agree with & support Flynn on what he’s trying to say… but friendly fire like this is unwarranted and doesn’t do anyone any good.
There are more effective ways to talk about this subject without demeaning some of the most loyal people there are to the truth. Digital soldiers.
With that said, those are my thoughts. I still respect & appreciate his service to this country.
by @MJTruthUltra
Hear Hear…love this take
While the interviewer needs to be respectful after the first minute of Flynn making his point… it MUST be asked – “so do you think Biden was duly elected? and (I’d continue if I were the host) >> if so, what are the obligations of officers to the administration? – is ‘resign en mass’ the only option?”
If a military officer believes in their heart the country is being led by a successful ‘elite capture’ strategy, what is their duty to the country and it’s citizens?
I’m sure that was just a snipit of the interview, but I would like to hear interviewers that are knowledgeable on the subject challenge their guests and not let them pontificate (not like Hannity of course, running over guests with their own diatribe). In a ‘normal’ world I get what Flynn is saying but damn, let’s get to the REALITY of our current situation !