Loading ...“the Clearinghouse”
“The audience gets a scandal, while the architecture carries on untouched.”
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-information-clearinghouse
“Coverage that finds the Epstein-JPMorgan emails and concludes ‘billionaires are corrupt’ has reached a dead end.”
The most effective clearing operation doesn’t suppress the audience most likely to care. It satisfies them.
People who already distrust institutional power are given a version of the truth that confirms what they suspected — corruption, censorship, private greed — and resolves into a conclusion that feels like vindication. When the people blamed then fall from grace, it feels like resolution. That audience doesn’t look for the structural analysis, because it believes the problem has already been solved.
Read the Epstein correspondence with fresh eyes, and ask one question: which threads, if the general public understood them, would pose an actual threat to the system the correspondence documents?
There is one more sign. Social media platforms have shown, extensively and in some cases under oath, that they suppress content the establishment finds inconvenient. Writers who publish material that genuinely threatens the institutional architecture don’t find themselves trending on X. They find their reach throttled, their posts buried, and their accounts flagged by trust and safety teams working with the very agencies whose operations the posts describe.