Loading ...This is dronegate…………. H.R. 8610
- Interesting every time the government makes a statement, they can’t help but mention hr 8610 drone defense bill.
- H.R. 8610 (the bill) just got added to the Continuing Resolution and extends a 2018 FAA law that was set to expire this month, adding vast multi-agency authority. Interestingly, this bill was introduced in June with little support until now.
- Did a quick read of H.R.8610 – Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act. The part that jumped out at me is the bill seeks permission for additional authority to monitor all US airspace for potential threats. This video shows how AI is used to identify potential threats in public spaces. If they use drones, our backyards could be recorded like this too. Every red flag, btw, is a potential threat. Notice how they’re all people?
- NJ Drone ‘Invasion’ Just In Time For Congress To Reauthorize Orwellian Law
- https://x.com/ConceptualJames/status/1869086833176633361/photo/1
There appear to be a BUNCH of lower-level non-government employed contractors willing to speak out on the drones — who’s paying them? What else is buried in H.R. 8610?
Actually the inverse, a drone offence bill.
Anyone notice the NATO/OTAN logo and what it could possibly have in common with those whose montra is.
“As above so below”.
These people are laughing at us.
Isn’t there an island for this ?
Turks and Chaos
As many of us have speculated this whole droneathon has been all about passing another govt. controlling piece of legisslation like the Patriot Act and numerous others, to subvert the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights. Naturally, they waited until the govt. was facing another orchestrated shutdown deaadline and stuffed it in.
So many things about this CR are absolutely disgusting.
And Mike Johnson defends it and says it sets the stage for Trump.
BULLSHIT.
There are too many “Hell No” clauses in this bill to argue that case.
Hopefully, Rand Paul filibusters it into next year.
And MJ has to go.
Absolutely INSANE !
Pork City: Johnson Tries To Ram Through Insane Funding Package
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pork-city-johnson-tries-ram-through-insane-funding-package
Highlights:
1. $8 BILLION—For Emergency Relief for damage caused by a cargo ship to the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, MD and 20 surrounding counties, including reconstruction of the bridge.
2. A section regarding our health agencies – has a lot of red flags – and appears to aim to limit what the new HHS Secretary (@RobertKennedyJr) can and cannot do:
“The Secretary may not revise the Vaccine Injury Table to include a vaccine for which the Centers for Disease Control &!Prevention has issued a recommendation for routine use in children or pregnant women until at least one application for such vaccine has been approved… Upon such revision of the Vaccine Injury Table, all vaccines in a vaccine category on the Vaccine Injury Table, including vaccines authorized under emergency use… shall be considered included in the Vaceine Injury Table and they also added “CLARIFICATION—Notwithstanding… an injury or death related to a vaceine administered at a time when the vaccine was a covered countermeasure subject to a declaration under section 319F-3(b) SHALL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION under the Program.”
3. Drinking Water Infrastructure Risk & Resilience Budget simply struck through their previous budget amount and just doubled their budgets across the board and updated the year(s)—because why not just double it.
From the bill:
—in paragraph (4), by strike: “$5,000,000′ and inserting “$10,000,000′;
—in paragraph (5) strike “$10,000,000′ and insert “$20,000,000′;
—in paragraph (6)—strike “$25,000,000′ and insert “$50,000,000”; & strike “2020 and 2021” and inserting “2026 and 2027”.
4. $3.5 BILLION— For Capital Improvement & Maintenance [p. 81]
5. $2.5 BILLION—For Nat’l Forest Maintenance, which designates $75,000,000 “for the construction or maintenance of shaded fuel breaks in the Pacific Regions” —a cool $75 mil for shady gas breaks.
6. The Department of Commerce added language that will make them exempt from the “Freedom of Information Act” [p. 269]
(A federally funded government agency—especially one overseeing Commerce should not be granted exemption from public transparency via FOIA. Unacceptable.)
7. $30.7 BILLION—Ag Research: Various research projects, including many viewed as low priority/redundant with a need for scrutiny to improve efficiency.
8. $1.5 BILLION—Economic Development Admin: criticized for funding projects with low economic return or favoritism. (Orwellian title FTW)
This is definitely an argument for bringing back the line item veto. It was pretty much mute when the Dems had the Presidency but with Trump coming back it would be useful. I can’t remember what if any ruling the Supremes had on it. Did it make it to them and what was the result?