Goldtent TA Paradise

Canada — The United Nations Globalist Operation to Seize Private Land Ownership from citizens – using UNDRIP as enforced by Canadian government – “You will Own Nothing and be Happy” – being implemented in real time NOW

1. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 22, 2026 - 3:46 pm at 3:46 pm

   MORE BULLSHIT FEAR MONGERING

   ACCORDING TO C0-PILOT HERE IS THE DEAL

   ARE HOME OWNERS IN PLACES IN BRITISG COLUMBIA IN DANGER OF LOING TITLE TO THEIR HOMES DUE TO INDIGINOUS LAND CLAIMS
   Copilot said:
   Copilot
   Short answer:
   For most homeowners in British Columbia, there is no immediate or automatic risk of losing title to their homes because of Indigenous land claims. However, recent court decisions have introduced real legal uncertainty in specific, limited areas—especially parts of Richmond, B.C.—and the issue is actively being appealed and negotiated.
   cbc
   +1

   Below is a clear, factual breakdown.

   1. What has not happened
   No mass loss of homes has occurred in B.C. due to Indigenous land claims.
   cbc
   Indigenous nations involved in recent cases (including the Cowichan/Quw’utsun Nation and Musqueam) have publicly stated they are not seeking to take private homes.
   cbc
   +1
   The B.C. government has repeatedly said private property is “not on the table” in negotiations, unless a homeowner is a willing seller.
   cbc
   +1
   2. Why people are worried anyway
   The concern comes mainly from a landmark B.C. Supreme Court decision in August 2025 (the Cowichan Tribes v. Canada case).

   What that ruling did:
   The court recognized Aboriginal title over land that includes urban areas, including some privately held parcels in Richmond.
   globalnews
   It ruled that Aboriginal title is a “prior and senior” right compared to fee?simple title granted by governments.
   bcpropertyrights
   It declared government-owned titles defective, but did not invalidate private homeowners’ titles.
   globalnews
   +1
   The court ordered governments to negotiate reconciliation, not seize homes.
   cbc
   Important: The decision is under appeal by both the provincial and federal governments, and could ultimately go to the Supreme Court of Canada.
   globalnews
   +1

   3. What this means right now for homeowners
   For most of B.C.
   No direct effect on your title
   No legal action against homeowners
   No court orders forcing people to give up homes
   For small, specific areas (e.g., parts of Richmond)
   Title remains valid
   Mortgages and sales are still happening
   Some lenders and appraisers are flagging uncertainty, which has affected property values, not ownership.
   604now
   +1
   Multiple appraisers and lenders have said the impact so far is driven by perception and uncertainty, not actual loss of property.
   yahoo

   4. Why B.C. is different from most of Canada
   Most of B.C. was never covered by historic treaties, unlike Ontario or the Prairies.
   thedeepdive
   This means many Indigenous title claims remain unresolved, sometimes overlapping.
   Courts are now being asked to reconcile:
   Indigenous constitutional rights
   Crown land grants
   Private property systems
   This legal reconciliation is unfinished, which is why uncertainty exists.
   osler

   5. Bottom line
   Homeowners are not suddenly losing their homes in British Columbia.
   However:

   Legal uncertainty exists in limited areas
   Appeals are ongoing
   Future court rulings will matter
   Property values and financing may be affected before ownership is
   This is a legal and political process still in motion, not a settled outcome

   Log in to Reply
2. Fullgoldcrown says:

   March 22, 2026 - 3:49 pm at 3:49 pm

   HOW MANY PRIVATE HOMES AND COMERCIAL PROPERTIES ARE AFFECTED BY THIS COURT DECISION
   Copilot said:
   Copilot
   Here is the most accurate, source?grounded answer available as of March 2026, with clear separation between what is known, what is estimated, and what is not determined.

   Short answer
   Roughly 125–150 private residential homes and several dozen major commercial/industrial properties fall within the geographic area covered by the Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (2025 BCSC 1490) decision in Richmond, B.C.
   However, no private titles were cancelled, and no court order transferred any private homes or businesses.
   deeded
   +1

   Residential properties (homes)
   Multiple legal and media sources describing the Cowichan ruling state that the claim area includes:

   Approximately 125–150 privately owned residential properties
   Mostly single?family homes in southeast Richmond, near the Fraser River
   This figure is cited consistently across legal explainers and real?estate analyses that reviewed the court record.
   deeded
   +1

   Importantly:
   The court explicitly did not invalidate these homeowners’ fee?simple titles, and stated they remain valid unless altered by a future court or negotiated settlement.
   deeded

   Commercial & industrial properties
   The same decision area includes significant commercial and industrial lands, notably:

   Large warehouse and logistics facilities
   Port?related and industrial lands
   Agricultural and commercial farmland
   A golf course and other commercial uses
   Named examples reported in court summaries and media coverage include facilities associated with:

   Amazon
   Canadian Tire
   Wayfair
   UPS
   Port?related operators
   While courts and governments have not published an official parcel?by?parcel count, reporting consistently refers to “dozens” of commercial and industrial properties within the affected area.
   deeded
   +1

   What the court actually ruled (critical clarification)
   The court:

   ? Recognized Aboriginal title
   ? Declared some Crown and city titles defective
   ? Did NOT cancel private property titles
   ? Did NOT order homes or businesses transferred
   ? Ordered governments to negotiate reconciliation
   This distinction is crucial and often lost in headlines.
   cbc
   +1

   Why the number is not higher
   The claim was site?specific, focused on a historic village area (Tl’uqtinus), not all of Richmond.
   It does not apply province?wide.
   Other Indigenous title cases in B.C. (e.g., Tsilhqot’in) explicitly excluded private lands.
   millertiterle
   Summary table
   Category Approximate number affected Legal status
   Private homes 125–150 Titles remain valid
   Commercial / industrial Several dozen Titles remain valid
   Province?wide homes 0 Not affected
   Homes seized 0 Has not happened
   Bottom line
   Hundreds, not thousands of properties are implicated geographically
   Zero private homes or businesses have lost title
   The case is under appeal
   Any future change would require new court rulings or negotiated agreements

   Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.