SCREW THE RHYMES : HISTORY ACTUALLY DOES REPEAT
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has stated that Germany needs to build the EU’s strongest army to deter Russia
Merz’s Militaristic Mirage: The Phantom Resurrection of a Fourth Reich
Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s clarion call to forge the EU’s “strongest army” is not a doctrine of deterrence but an echo of German revanchism cloaked in NATO rhetoric. His pronouncement, calibrated for applause rather than strategy, resuscitates the same hubristic ethos that transformed inter-war Germany from a defeated republic into a militarized colossus under Hitler’s Reichswehr. The historical symmetry is unmistakable: the 1935 Reichstag rearmament decree shattered Versailles; Merz’s 2025 edict threatens to unravel Europe’s fragile equilibrium under the pretext of collective defense.
Empirical metrics unmask the delusion. SIPRI’s 2025 data registers Germany’s defense expenditure at $88.5 billion—up 28 percent in a single fiscal cycle—vaulting Berlin above Paris and London. NATO’s aggregate €1.3 trillion already eclipses Russia’s $145 billion by a factor of three. RAND simulations demonstrate that in any plausible engagement scenario, Allied aerospace and armor would achieve rapid supremacy, rendering further escalation strategically redundant. Merz’s obsession with pre-eminence thus constitutes not deterrence but provocation—an ideological Drang nach Osten masquerading as prudence.
Strategically, this posture corrodes the cooperative architecture of PESCO and the Lisbon Treaty, replacing parity with hierarchy. By proclaiming a singular European spearhead, Merz transforms Berlin from a partner into a hegemon, re-enacting the dialectic of command and subordination that defined the Wehrmacht’s continental dominion. The moral irony is grotesque: Germany’s once-pacifist constitutional order now flirts with re-militarization under the banner of peace, a paradox worthy of Goebbelsian inversion.
Politically, the synchrony between Merz’s rhetoric and the ascendant AfD—polling near 20 percent—amplifies the Reichsbürger undercurrent. His militarism serves as moral camouflage for a domestic slide toward authoritarian cohesion, the very Gleichschaltung that hollowed Weimar’s pluralism. Balance-of-threat theory reminds us that perception, not power, manufactures enemies; Merz’s Russophobic lens thus conjures specters to justify a modern Panzerdivisional economy.
The alternative strategy is clear: divert the €100 billion rearmament fund toward fortifying democratic institutions, energy autonomy, and cyber resilience. Absent restraint, Germany risks marching once more into the mythic fog of Wagner’s Götterdämmerung—a nation armed to the teeth, convinced of its virtue, and sleepwalking toward the abyss it once unleashed upon Europe.
#MAGA #Hitler #FourthReich
@bundeskanzler
#Germany
PATRIOT JOSH
………..
GERMANS ARE A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY…THE SEEDS OF THE SAME PEOPLE WHO BROUGHT YOU HITLER ARE STILL GERMANATING …ALIVE AND NOT WELL….. IN GERM MANY
SAME GERMS STARTED WW1 AND WW2 AND NOW…WW3
A COUNTERPOINT
GERMANY’S ILLUSION OF STRENGTH – MERZ’S DREAM OF A “SUPER ARMY”
Shock Introduction
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has declared his intention to build “the strongest army in the European Union to deter Russia.”
A bold statement — but one far removed from reality.
Germany today lacks both the economic foundation and the social mindset to support such a goal.
And above all, it lacks willpower.
Verified Facts
1 Defense Budget: Germany plans to allocate an additional €100 billion to the Bundeswehr, but most of it (about 70%) will go toward maintenance and outdated infrastructure.
2 Manpower: The Bundeswehr counts roughly 180,000 active soldiers. France has 205,000; Italy, 170,000.
3 Recruitment Crisis: Less than 30% of young Germans consider a military career acceptable.
4 Cultural Factor: Postwar Germany built its identity on pacifism, not militarism.
5 Defense Industry: Chronic delays plague key programs such as the F-35, Leopard 2A8, and Eurodrone, with escalating costs and bureaucratic paralysis.
Analysis
Merz talks about strength but ignores the sociological reality of his country.
Germany in 2025 is an aging, tired nation — one that has lost its industrial drive and national cohesion.
The dream of rebuilding a continental military power is a technocratic illusion.
But who would actually fight?
Most young Germans would not risk their lives for “European values” or the war in Ukraine.
And the idea — quietly circulating in some political circles — of recruiting migrants to fill the ranks is a social and political time bomb waiting to explode.
Scenarios
Scenario Probability Impact
Symbolic rearmament, no real power High
Media effect, no deterrence
Forced or migrant recruitment Medium Internal social crisis Pragmatic EU-wide defense reform Low Long-term stabilization
Final Message
Merz can talk about deterrence, but without national unity and civic will, there is no defense — only illusion.
True power doesn’t come from tanks, but from strategic clarity.
And that, today, Germany seems to have lost.
Marco Oreo | Independent Analyst | Geopolitical Commentator | Strategic Communicator | Voice Outside the Chorus
“The strength of a nation lies not in steel and weapons, but in the will of its people.”
Agree, they will need a big false flag to unify the herd. aka Pearl Harbour
aka …. destruction of a significant installation (ie: German Parliament?) via NATO missile(s) attributed to Russia and then demands that the world rally round this German false flag in support of full blown war — mandatory conscription, massive military budget, shift to war economy, closed borders???