“In its conclusion, the Court finds that it has not been established that the rights of the applicant, employed for a federal government supplier, were violated.

Nor has it been established that the plaintiff  would suffer irreparable harm if the sought injunction was not issued,the judgment reads.

The Court explained that  while [the applicant] may or may not be successful in challenging the constitutionality of the provider’s vaccination policy when the case is heard on the merits, he did not meet the requirements for that policy to be suspended until this challenge is heard.

https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1839618/cour-federale-rejet-injonction-vaccin-obligatoire-fonctionnaires