Goldtent TA Paradise

JEFF CHILDERS — Late last night, the New York Times alarmingly reported, “W.H.O. Declares Ebola Outbreak a Global Health Emergency.”

1. Kewl2 says:

   May 20, 2026 - 1:52 pm at 1:52 pm

   https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/dedication-and-scholarship-monday?

   The hantavirus fizzled out, so a new media health hysteria has magically appeared like a twisted Marvel antihero whose superpower is keeping liberals frantic and anxious. (Democrats: hear me. It might look like it, but the media is not your friend.) Late last night, the New York Times alarmingly reported, “W.H.O. Declares Ebola Outbreak a Global Health Emergency.” Guess what the WHO’s last global health emergency was? Monkeypox. Before that, covid.

   image 7.png

   Since 2020, the WHO has declared no fewer than six public health emergencies, averaging one a year. Almost like it was scheduled or a quota or something. But I digress.

   Specifically, this time it was about 246 suspected cases of Ebola and 80 deaths have been reported in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo —remember those two countries— although, the Times admitted, only ten of those cases have been verified as Ebola by a lab test.

   The Times failed to mention that, buried inside the WHO’s own announcement, was this sentence: “The outbreak does not meet the criteria of pandemic emergency, as defined in the IHR.” Um. They are declaring an emergency over something they say is not an emergency. This kind of Orwellian, bureaucratic wordplay exposed the whole racket in a single sentence.

   Nevertheless, the Times is freaking out. We should, too! In fact, the whole public health establishment is freaking out. (Performatively, of course.)

   WHO Director Tedros Whatshisname called it “a serious threat that requires our collective action and global solidarity.” Public health halfwits like infamous pandemic grifter “Dr.” Neil Stone have been tweeting up a storm:

   image.png

   The Times warned its readers that “there is no approved vaccine and no therapeutics for the Bundibugyo species of Ebola behind the outbreak.” So … what do they expect us to do? Lockdowns? Grocery arrows? Face masks? Mail-in voting??

   I promise I did not make this next part up. Just one paragraph after declaring there are no vaccines and no treatments, the Grey Lady provided her prescription for the USA: “to share vaccines, treatments, and other resources needed to contain the outbreak.” Um. Which is it? Are there vaccines and treatments, or aren’t there? The world’s dumbest newspaper.

   Of course, the truth lay in the ambiguous words “other resources,” tacked after vaccines and treatments like an afterthought. In other words, they want our money.

   Very late in the article, far beyond the point that most of the paper’s regular readers would have fled to hide beneath their beds, the Times finally contextualized the current ‘outbreak’ of 246 infections and 80 deaths. I report it here in the original:

   image 8.png
   So— the current outbreak is a rounding error compared to the last big one ten years ago. And since 2014 or so, Ebola outbreaks in Congo and Uganda have become nearly an annual event. We’ve pivoted straight from hantavirus cruise ship hysteria to recycled Ebola hype.

   At some point, sooner rather than later, we must consider retiring the entire “pandemic preparedness” racket. Big pharma’s and public health officials’ salaries and avenues to personal wealth creation depend too much on germaphobia and pathogenesis, which is a horrible incentive for about ten thousand reasons.

   I say we pull the plug on the whole thing, and take our chances, like we always used to do back when pandemics were rare 100-year events, not 10-year carnivals of recurring corruption.

   Log in to Reply
2. Kewl2 says:

   May 20, 2026 - 1:57 pm at 1:57 pm

   The PHEIC Ebola outbreak making it to the “news” – Jessica Rose

   Ebola has a high kill rate. It burns out locally. This is yet another perfect example of a virus that is an exceedingly unlikely candidate in terms of global spread (“emergency”), and this is precisely because it is easy to recognize (short incubation period) symptom-wise, and to contain (active care brings CFR down markedly).

   Ebola is not contagious until symptoms appear!!, and transmission requires direct contact with bodily fluids of symptomatic people or contaminated materials.

   If you ask me, this is another straw-grasping attempt to secure relevancy and funding by certain entities and organizations. Keep going. The night is darkest before the dawn. Fear not.

   https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-pheic-ebola-outbreak-making-it?

   Log in to Reply
3. Kewl2 says:

   May 20, 2026 - 2:08 pm at 2:08 pm

   Ebola vaccine could take nine months as death toll rises further, WHO warns — https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy2g197dp8o

   Ebola strain in latest outbreak has no vaccine or treatment — https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/ebola-strain-in-latest-outbreak-has-no-vaccine-or-treatment/ar-AA23vaCk?

   A rare Ebola strain is spreading with no vaccine. Here’s what you need to know — https://www.npr.org/2026/05/20/nx-s1-5826910/ebola-outbreak-africa-risks

   FEARMONGERING MACHINE TURNED UP HIGH

   Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.