Goldtent TA Paradise
GRIN : ALIVE AND WELL
SEEING TRUTH IN THE AGE OF INFORMATION OVERLOAD
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
READ OUR DISCLAIMER
GOLDTENT STATEMENT OF NON VIOLENCE
CONTACT
WE ARE THE MEDIA
>GOLDTENT< WE CAME FOR THE GOLD
MAGA VS FAGA
THE EXPOSING OF THE SATANIC FORCES VIA THE EPSTEIN FILES
TRANS INSANITY
IT'S ALL IN THE FAMILY
FULL GOLD CROWN
WHO AND WHAT
LET THE MAN COOK
WHO ARE THE ENEMIES OF THE STATE ?
BRITISH COLOR REVOLUTION NOW PLAYING
A CHRISTMAS MIRACLE
LIES DAMN LIES AND STATISTICS
THE KING
SCIENTISM
Polls
Loading ...COVID 19 "VACCINES" AND CANCER
TRUMP'S VENEZUELA STRATEGY
NAZISM / FASCISM ALIVE AND WELL
TRUMP JUST DECLARED WAR ON THE BACKBONE
THE INSURRECTION PROCLAMATION
SILVER IS A STORE OF VALUE AND IS KEEPING UP WITH INFLATION
STANDBY
SOMALIGATE
HOW THE DEMOCRATS
DID VACCINES REALLY SAVE THE WORLD ?
SILVER 50 YEAR CHART
SILVER CAUTION WARANTED
IT'S TIME TO TELL YOU EVERYTHING
EMERALD ROBINSON EXPOSES. VENEZUELAN CARTEL ELECTION RIGGING..WATCH THIS LINK FOR UPDATES
- **MADURO COUP DETATE IS PRIMARILY ABOUT ELECTION RIGGING **
- BEHOLD THE NARCO TERRORIST SENATOR LIST
- Maduro’s Ex-Insider Turns Snitch, Sends Trump an Explosive Letter
- MARIA CORINA MACHADO
- SECOND HIGH LEVEL VENEZUELAN WHISTLEBLOWER LETTER TO TRUMP
- THE WORLDWIDE ELECTION RIGGING OPERATION AND THE 2024 DRAMATIC STICK SAVE
- VIDEO PT 1
- VIDEO PT 2
- VIDEO PT 3
ELECTION FIXING NETWORK AND HOW IT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED
WESTERN ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE IS A DEATH CULT
NEW CANCER TREATMENT PROTOCOL
WHY "SMART" PEOPLE
GEORGE ORWELL
WHO IS ?
THE WHOLE BULL AND NOTHING BUT THE BULL
TRUMP'S WAR ON THE CARTELS
IT'S A MIRACLE
BE YOUR OWN DOCTOR
- * DMSO HANDBOOK *
- * THE RANT *
- * THE UBIQUITOUS PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY
- 100% CANCER REMISSION (MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY)
- 2ND SMARTES GUY CANCER PROTOCOL
- ANTI PARASITIC DRUGS SHOW STRONG ANTI CANCER EFFECTS
- ANTIPARASITIC VETERINARIAN DRUGS SHOW PROMISE FOR CANCER TREATMENT
- BLOOD PRESSURE SCAM
- BREST CANCER AND THE VAXX
- BRUSH YOUR TEETH DAMMIT
- C D S ( CHLORINE DIOXIDE SOLUTION )
- CBD GUMMIES AND TIGER WOODS
- CHEMOTHERAPY FAILURE RATES
- CHLOESTEROL : A BIG PHARM BIG CON
- CHLORINE DIOXIDE DETOX
- CURCUMEN
- DANDELION ROOT
- DISSOLUTION OF SPIKE PROTEIN ( NATTOKINASE)
- DMSO : MIRACULOUS PAIN TREATMENT
- DMSO2
- DOXYCYCLINE and CANCER: At Least 12 Anti-Cancer Mechanisms of Action
- EARTHING
- FENBENDAZOLE Q AND A
- FIBROUS BLOOD CLOTS TREATMENT
- FLCCC VACCINE DETOX PROTOCOL
- HEALING POWER OF ILLNESS
- HEALTHY GUT BACTERIUM MICROBIOME
- HIGH DOSE ( IV) VITAMIN C A STRONG CANCER TREATMENT
- INFLAMATION
- IT'S DEPRESSING : ANTIDEPRESSANTS KILL
- IVERMECTIN AND FENBENDAZOLE TO PREVENT CANCER
- IVERMECTIN PILLS HERE
- IVERMECTIN PROPHYLACSIS
- IVERMECTION CURES CANCER ?
- LIPITOR WARNING
- LYME DISEASE CURE
- METHYLENE BLUE
- MICRODOSING LITHIUM BOOSTS YOUR BRAIN AND PREVENTS ALZHIEMERS
- MRE ON DMSO
- NATTOKINASE …SPIKE DETOX
- NATTOKINASE : THE HOLY GRAIL FOR SPIKE DETOX
- NATTOKINASE DISOLVES MICROCLOTS
- Nattokinase Dissolves 84% of Amyloid Microclots Within 2 Hours
- NEW CANCER PROTOCOL
- NEW STUDIES AND PROTOCOLS
- NICOTINE THE MIRACLE CURE
- PSA SCREENING : A PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTER
- Ranking the Top 19 Terminal Cancer Repurposed Drugs
- SALT SCAM
- SHEDDING IS REAL : WHAT CAN YOU DO ABOUT IT ?
- SSRI ANTI DEPRESSANTS ARE A HORROR STPRY
- TETANUS
- THE GREAT ALZHEIMER'S SCAM AND REAL CURES
- THE GREAT BLOOD PRESSURE SCAM
- THE VEGAN SCAM
- TOP TEN DETOX ITEMS
- TREATING COPD NATURALLY
- TREATING COPD NATURALLY
- UVBI ( ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT BLOOD IRRADIATION )
- WHY HERBS AND SUPPLIMENTS WORK ( McCULLOUGH)
- YES VIRGINIA..A CURE FOR CANCER
WHAT IF EVERYTHING YOU THINK YOU KNOW
I THINK THE CHARGE HERE
HONEYPOT
MAYBE THE US DEBT
PAINTING THE FULL PICTURE
NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE A FANTASY
SIX WAYS
33 Shocking Facts That Prove That The Entire U.S. Healthcare Industry
THE NAZIS NEVER WENT AWAY
THE CHOSEN ONE
MASS TRUMP PSYCHOSIS
THE CULT OF MODERN MEDICINE
WHEN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IMPLODES
THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING
THE OBLITERATION OF VIROLOGY
A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN REGION
"ORGANIZED" RELIGION
DEFINE WOKE
1.600 SCIENTISTS DESTROY THE CLIMATE GHOULS
VACCINES IN GENERAL
PSYCHOPATHS
PCR TEST WAS COMPLETE BULLSHIT
THE ANTI-VAXXERS
BAD BATCHES
WHY SOME HAVE ADVERSE REACTIONS AND OTHERS DON'T
WHERE DOES ELECTRICTY
GEOGRAPHICAL WONDER
ANTIVAXXERS
* WELCOME TO FORT DETRICK
* STATISTICAL TRICKS
* THE BASIC LAWS
* TOM LUONGO'S THESIS
* MASKS HARBOUR PATHOGENIC
* WHAT IS A WOMAN
* WUHAN MILITARY GAMES
* OPTIMISM
* THE FREEDOM CONVOY
* NATURAL IMMUNITY IS KING
* 34% OF CANADIANS UNVAXXED
* COVID: ISRAEL VS PALESTINE
* THE THREE STAGES
* 100 MILLION AMERICANS
* GROUND ZERO
* COVID VACCINES CANNOT WORK
* HISPANIOLA
* PUBLIC HEALTH
* WHO ARE THE VAXX REFUSERS
THE ORIGINS OF COVID
POSTING INFORMATION
CO-PILOT HAS THE ANSWER AND THE BOTTOM LINE IS ZERO HEDGE IS BEING PURPOUSLY MISLEADING
Below are credible articles, economist commentary, and fact?checks that directly refute (or substantially undermine) the ZeroHedge thesis that “2.5 million native?born jobs were a mirage” in the sense of being fake, fraudulent, or evidence of labor?market collapse. I separate what they explicitly refute from what they concede, and I cite each source carefully.
1. Investopedia: “Millions of American Workers Just Appeared. Why That Might Be a Mirage” (Aug 15, 2025)
Source: Investopedia
Core refutation:
Economists interviewed by Investopedia state that the apparent surge (and subsequent disappearance) of native?born workers does not represent real job creation or job loss, but instead reflects survey population control distortions in the CPS (household survey). [investopedia.com]
Key points that refute ZeroHedge’s framing:
The CPS showed an implausible jump in the native?born population itself, which signals a measurement problem, not a real employment boom or bust.
Economists explicitly warn against interpreting changes in levels of native?born employment as economic outcomes.
UBS economists Jonathan Pingle and Alan Detmeister describe the effect as respondent reclassification and population estimation noise, not jobs being “created” and then “revised away”. [investopedia.com]
Why this matters:
ZeroHedge treats the revision as proof that jobs “never existed.” Investopedia shows the issue is who is counted as native?born and how many people exist in the denominator, not employment reality.
2. FactCheck.org: “Trump’s Native?Born Job?Creation Claim Based on Questionable Figures” (Dec 23, 2025)
Source: FactCheck.org
Core refutation:
FactCheck explains that native?born vs. foreign?born employment levels are not suitable for claims about job creation, because they are driven by Census population controls rather than payroll dynamics. [factcheck.org]
Direct rebuttals to ZeroHedge’s thesis:
The “apparent boom” in native?born employment is described as a statistical artifact, not a deception or data manipulation.
Census Bureau guidance explicitly warns analysts not to use these series to infer labor?market performance.
Revisions do not imply earlier numbers were “fake,” only that they were based on outdated population assumptions. [factcheck.org]
Important nuance:
FactCheck does not deny revisions occurred; it denies that revisions imply economic fraud or collapse.
3. Washington Monthly: “No, Native?Born Employment Has Not Soared” (Sept 1, 2025)
Source: Washington Monthly
Core refutation:
This article explains that population controls introduced in early 2025 mechanically inflated native?born employment counts, and later revisions merely corrected that inflation. [washington…onthly.com]
Explicit refutations:
The article emphasizes that analysts should focus on rates (employment?to?population, unemployment) rather than headline native?born job totals.
It states plainly that neither the rise nor the fall in native?born employment reflects real labor?market shifts.
The revision is described as methodological housekeeping, not a reversal of genuine job gains. [washington…onthly.com]
4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Official Explanation)
Source: BLS Employment Situation, February 2026
Core refutation:
The BLS explicitly states that January 2026 data were revised due to updated population estimates, affecting employment levels across multiple categories, not just native?born workers. [bls.gov]
What this directly contradicts:
ZeroHedge implies targeted or suspicious revision; BLS documents routine annual re?benchmarking.
The revisions affected:
Working?age population
Labor force size
Employment levels
Participation rates
across the entire household survey, not selectively. [bls.gov]
Crucially:
BLS does not characterize the prior data as “wrong,” “fake,” or erroneous—only superseded by improved population estimates.
5. AFP Fact Check: “Posts claiming immigrants displacing US?born workers are misleading” (June 20, 2024)
Source: Agence France?Presse
Core refutation:
AFP fact?checkers argue that claims built on native?born vs. foreign?born employment changes ignore demographic realities, especially retirements and age structure differences. [factcheck.afp.com]
Relevant counterpoints:
A majority of “foreign?born” workers are legal residents or citizens.
Native?born employment declines often reflect retirement of baby boomers, not job displacement.
Month?to?month nativity changes are statistically noisy and routinely misinterpreted. [factcheck.afp.com]
What is conceded by serious critics (and where ZeroHedge overreaches)
? Conceded by economists:
The native?born employment series is volatile and misleading
Large revisions occurred
Political actors misused the data
? Rejected by economists:
That 2.5 million jobs were “fake”
That revisions imply labor?market collapse
That BLS fabricated employment gains
That the data can support claims about immigration “taking jobs”
Bottom line
There are strong, mainstream refutations of the ZeroHedge thesis, and they agree on this core point:
The revision erased a statistical overcount, not real employment.
ZeroHedge is factually correct about the size of the revision, but misleading about its meaning.
Claim 5 — “Native?born employment is back to 2019 ? therefore the administration’s ‘accomplishment’ was fake”
What ZeroHedge implies: a political/evaluative conclusion from one series. [brookings.edu]
What the evidence shows:
The analytic sources warn against drawing sweeping conclusions from the level series for native?born employment in CPS precisely because it is sensitive to population controls and response/weighting artifacts.
Kolko specifically advises looking at more stable indicators; in his PIIE chart commentary he notes that household survey nativity employment/population swings are misleading and points to the native?born unemployment rate as a more relevant gauge (he notes it increased in 2025).
Fox likewise says if native?born workers were truly making big gains, you’d look to employment?to?population measures rather than a headline nativity level jump. [fredblog.s…uisfed.org], [themidwesterner.news], [bls.gov] [cis.org] [bls.gov]
Bottom line: Even if the native?born level appears “back to X,” the sources say that does not justify concluding “the accomplishment was fake,” because the metric itself is not reliable for that inferenc
Claim 6 — “This revision shows prior reports were wrong/misleading; therefore trust in BLS is undermined”
What ZeroHedge suggests: revisions prove the data was “fake.” [brookings.edu]
What the evidence shows:
BLS documentation and Brookings both stress that population control updates are normal and that comparability breaks can occur because historical data are typically not revised in line with usual practice, creating apparent discontinuities at the update point.
BLS even created experimental series to help account for the January 2025 population control discontinuity, which underscores that the agency treats it as a measurement/comparability issue, not “fake dat
CONCLUSION ZERO HEDGE IS FAKE NEWS !