If there was a valid, genuine, legitimate and valuable CIA asset within the 37 names who lost their security clearances [then the] issue would be quickly and quietly resolved by just not taking the action against that person. Saying nothing, doing nothing, makes the “mistake” (if that’s what it was) disappear.

The CIA complaining about it to the Wall Street Journal is what makes the issue a problem. That’s how you can identify this story as an organized intelligence community political hit against Tulsi Gabbard.

Increasingly, it is becoming more and more clear that Tulsi Gabbard is factually doing what the Intelligence Community feared she would be doing.

DNI Gabbard is targeting all of the political weaponization within the Intelligence Community, and she is methodically removing the corrupt people within the system who participate.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/08/28/ic-leakers-target-director-of-national-intelligence-tulsi-gabbard-again/

The CIA changed [Gurganus] status in June in order to stop the DNI from revealing who was responsible for fabricating the false ICA.