Loading ...Could The Deagel Report Be True? A disappeared think-tank report may be the ultimate clue to the purpose of the COVID vaccines.
ONE FOR THE DOOMERS
https://www.emerald.tv/p/could-the-deagel-report-be-true?
…………….
Personally I think …if the goal of the mRNA shots was to reduce Populations in the West by up to 70% by 2025
They Failed Miserably …unless you believe a Billion or 2 are going to drop dead in the next 7 months
PS….Mr. Deagel is deader than a dead dingo’s donger
Deagel reported their knowledge of a plan in the works.
Whether they failed or succeeded, they likely TRIED.
It is too early to judge failure as many will not survive the attempt:
Week 22 of 2024 Excess Cancer Mortality in younger bracket, ages 0 – 54.
– elevated 29% and still rising. 12-sigma event.
Inflection began on Week 51 of 2020.
https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1800678142732075113
C: Why did it start before the jab roll out…? Missed appointments and all that in 2020?
Ethical Skeptic –> The inflection occurs right when millions of health workers got their first-priority shots.
C: Right when a cause-hypothesis would suggest it would have. Jack Pearson
C: Wouldn’t there need to be a delay after mass vaccinations for excess mortality? Few months at least would have been my guess
Ethical Skeptic –> That is for any one case or the average, but not for a tail signal under the Law of Large Numbers.
The ‘delay’ has not even hit yet, and might not be for 15 years (the peak).
I disagree K2
For 70% depopulation this year in the US Alone you would need 240 million NET deaths in 7 months
That is NOT the trajectory here
Excess deaths in under 54 year olds is insignificant ( not to those who are dying but….)….since the baseline of deaths in that age group is very very LOW