Loading ...A PROFESSIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORCAST IS NEVER WRONG
I don’t usually follow our Friend ex Goldtenter Northstar But after checking his twiter Page on a tip I see someone calling him out on this HUBRIS . Pride goeth before the Fall !
corrected link ( click on “show replies” for the full “discussion”)
https://twitter.com/KostaAC1/status/1674026021505433600
Meanwhile Regarding his Man made Climate Change Stance , one presumes it is never to be challenged either .
hubris?
I can’t spel worth a ship
🙂
But what do you think of this hubris ? See corrected link…thanks Homer
This appears to be the wrong link (from a earlier post?).
Its DEAD wrong, simply because he doesn’t (from what I can tell) outline the ALTs (and worse, he seems to make them implicit not explicit). Without spel ing it uwt, he’s homing in entirely on one option without providing the others or their probability weights. And then yes, his primary “count” has been wrong. At least in the PROBABILITY he assigned it. Whatever % he gave it, it should have been zero (post facto).
and dont forget his “to the moon partner”. IF just 2 of those to the moon charts would pan out, everyone could retire.
I wrote his partner off after the conversation I had with him about the performance of Homestake Mining during the years after 1929. The guy never heard of it.