No Inflation On A Gold Standard
What most people don’t understand is that for over a hundred years in both the UK and the US there was basically no inflation because both were on a gold standard. When your currency is real money(gold) you don’t have inflation. However when politicians and or central bankers want to create money to spend on wars and or social programs to buy votes, they cannot do so if a country is on a gold standard. This article is must reading for anyone who doesn’t realize this or just needs a refresher in the basics of money and banking.
“The current situation of currencies with no relationship to gold has only been in place for fifty-two years. Before that, the link was gradually eroded from Roosevelt’s ban on ownership by American citizens in 1933, its revaluation in dollar terms the following year, and the Bretton Woods agreement in 1944. In has been a journey away from sound money lasting ninety years. Despite this progressive attrition, prices, particularly of commodities and raw materials were relatively stable before the ending of all links between gold and currencies. Now we should turn to empirical evidence of price behaviour under a proper gold standard, as shown in the chart below.
This is the only long run of statistical evidence of price stability under a gold standard and is of wholesale prices in the UK following the Napoleonic Wars. As usually happens, there was a post war slump as war spending ceased, reversing war-time inflation, and leading to lower prices. The gold sovereign coin standard was introduced in 1817, which continued to be exchangeable for Bank of England banknotes until the First World War. And as the new gold coin standard bedded in, the cyclical changes in price levels gradually diminished, partly due to improvements in the banking system, such as in the clearing system set up by the London banks, which was joined by the Bank of England in 1864.
Before 1914, the British government paid down most of its record high levels of Napoleonic War debt. Through industrial development, the British economy improved the living standards of the people substantially. And despite its diminutive size, Britain became the wealthiest nation in the world. As can be seen from the chart, after a shaky start producer prices became remarkably stable, barely changing in aggregate over almost a century.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/why-credit-needs-golden-anchor

Armstrong on a return to a gold standard.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/tag/gold-standard/
His argument doesn’t wash. Gold mining has produced between 2-3% annual increase over time. He chooses periods in 14th and 15th century as examples to make whatever his point is? The period described in this article with my post is more modern by hundreds of years and worked fine in both the UK and the US. Of course you have periods of prosperity and others that were less so, happen throughout history. At least with gold you have almost no inflation and stability and economic freedom if people are allowed to own gold. I don’t know why people on this sight place so much stock in so called experts like Armstrong and Luongo. Do they sometimes make intelligent, articulate points, yes. But often times they are wrong like anyone else. There are so many good sources of info and intellectual thought many of which goldtenters bring to this site which is why I like it. I don’t follow nor place much stock in any of these gurus that some seem to gravitate to. I gather in all the info out there and make my own conclusions based on history and critical thought. The gold standard works, and has worked throughout history better than anything else and will and would work again if given a chance and not hindered by political or arbitrary contraints.
Agree CM
Your example is real. No inflation on the Gold Standard…BY DEFINITION !
Also agree about Gurus
Personally i do resonate with Luongo’s work though…thats my personal assessment
Armstrong …Not so much…have seen him miss too many times…AND I don’t like his personality