THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
TO SIR …WITH GOLD
………………
THE WORD THAT JUMPS OFF THE PAGE ISN’T GOLD. IT ISN’T SILVER. IT’S “SIR.”
Look at the framing:
“Yes SIR, we have an INITIAL VALUE…”
Not an estimate.
Not a market projection.
Not a target.
A value. Set.
Now connect that to what we’ve been tracking:
Inventory the assets.
Establish benchmarks.
Set minimum values.
Reconcile sovereign claims.
Then allocate.
That is how you would build the accounting layer before any larger sovereign-wealth or asset-backed structure could go live.
The $10,000 gold / $600 silver numbers in this graphic are hypothetical, not an announced Treasury valuation.
But the concept is the interesting part:
If the system were being revalued, somebody would have to decide the starting ledger values BEFORE the switch was flipped.
And the wording here captures exactly what we’ve been asking:
“Sir… we have an initial value.”
Maybe the Great Revaluation doesn’t begin with a market spike.
Maybe it begins with an accounting entry.
If we flip from debt based money to asset based money, we have one problem.
Backing the money sure seems like those backing assets have to be set aside.
(Like the hoarding that China was doing a decade ago)
It takes them OUT of the supply chain.
For gold, that matters less, because so little of it gets USED UP.
In this sense, BTC has an advantage say over SILVER, which is an industrial metal.
It gets used in MISSILES … and that’s such a valuable thing now, we’d hate to be deprived of that, right?
BUT SERIOUSLY, crude is off the table here, unless its a Reserve.
Standing timber might be an option.
Hydroelectric dams (with enough water) could be an option.
Port facilities and Airports (that stream services) might play.
So all the things the IMF forced countries to privatize when their finances went south, might work.
Hmmmmm.