HUGE SCOTUS WIN: The US Supreme Court has LIFTED a judge’s block on President Trump requiring mail-in ballot tracking and citizenship lists to vote, while the case proceeds
Even without any help from the senate, Trump reformed mail in ballots.
And all the doomers said this would never work.
This makes case which the Supreme Court has just said is likely to be won on the merits would make the Save Act all but Moot
BREAKING: SCOTUS ends lower court blockade on President Trump’s elections executive order. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissent.
https://x.com/ShawnFleetwood/status/2091994418911777094
AND
BREAKING: Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered a sharp rebuke to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision limiting nationwide injunctions by U.S. district judges.
In the majority opinion, Barrett wrote:
“JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever. Waving away attention to the limits on judicial power as a ‘mind-numbingly technical query,’ she offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush.”
She continued:
“We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
The Court ruled that district judges generally cannot issue nationwide injunctions that block federal policies across the entire country for parties not before the court.
not often we’ve gotten to say “Go ACB”.
as usual what does that mean Pedro?
AMY COMEY BARRETT = ACB
I always knew she had it in her…… it’s good she took the opportunity-
Supreme Court Backs Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Overhaul
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-backs-trumps-mail-ballot-overhaul
Notably, the decision did not address the legality of Trump’s order, only the timing of the challenge to it…
Over the dissent of the court’s three liberal judges, SCOTUS’ ruling means that the Trump administration can move forward with a proposal for DHS to compile state-specific lists of people it believes are eligible to vote in the Democratic-led states that had challenged the plan in court.
“Today’s decision does not address whether the President’s attempts to interfere with States’ administration of the November 2026 elections are lawful. Nor does it suggest that the Executive Branch has any constitutional or statutory authority to implement the President’s directives,” Sotomayor wrote. “Instead, today’s decision merely postpones adjudication of those challenges.”
“The court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the government to implement the order will necessarily be lawful,” the court wrote.
“On that score, time will tell. But the order itself does not harm the states, so the District Court lacked jurisdiction to bar the government from trying to implement it. And for the reasons discussed, that injunction is likely to irreparably harm the government if it remains in place while the appellate process runs its course.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-backs-trumps-mail-ballot-overhaul
Supreme Court eases path for Trump’s sweeping limits on mail-in balloting – Washington Post
The legal fight will continue, but the president’s executive order could inject fresh uncertainty into the already high-stakes midterm elections.
https://archive.ph/qHPJW#selection-283.0-283.145
John from CTH comments (in detail)
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/24/supreme-court-lifts-district-court-injunction-permitting-trump-administration-to-move-forward-on-postal-voting-plan/#comment-12769754
from
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/24/supreme-court-lifts-district-court-injunction-permitting-trump-administration-to-move-forward-on-postal-voting-plan/