“My researched suspicion around motive was the DOJ needed to protect evidence Mueller had already extracted from fraudulent FISA authority. That was the motive.<\/p>\n
In July 2018 if the DOJ-NSD admitted the FISA application and all renewals [were] fatally flawed Robert Mueller would have needed to withdraw any evidence gathered as a result of its exploitation. The DOJ in 2018, under the leadership of Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein for all things Russiagate, was protecting Mueller\u2019s poisoned fruit.<\/p>\n
If the DOJ had been honest with the court, there\u2019s a strong possibility some, perhaps much, of Mueller evidence gathering would have been invalidated\u2026 and cases were pending. The solution: mislead the court and claim the predication was still valid.”<\/p>\n
https:\/\/theconservativetreehouse.com\/blog\/2025\/08\/07\/outline-1-criminal-conduct-by-doj-fbi-during-russiagate\/<\/a><\/p>\n (only for masochists, but note the granular detail and documentation)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" “My researched suspicion around motive was the DOJ needed to protect evidence Mueller had already extracted from fraudulent FISA authority. That was the motive. In July 2018 if the DOJ-NSD admitted the FISA application and all renewals [were] fatally flawed … Continue reading