![\"\"](\"https:\/\/goldtadise.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/SOV-1.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nExperts, who have no idea what caused the Spain, Portugal, France, or Bali blackouts, are one hundred percent sure these events are not connected in any way. And that\u2019s the giveaway. These stories never speculate about or even mention the Earth\u2019s weakening magnetic field, even if only to rule it out or call it a conspiracy theory.<\/p>\n
In intelligence analysis or trial advocacy, this is what you\u2019d call a conspicuous omission\u2014 the kind that raises more red flags than any official statement could settle. It\u2019s not just what the articles say. It\u2019s what they carefully avoid even mentioning.<\/p>\n
The fact that Earth\u2019s magnetic field is both weakening and moving around isn\u2019t fringe theory\u2014 it\u2019s well documented by NASA and ESA, and published in Nature and Geophysical Research Letters. The South Atlantic Anomaly, polar drift, and magnetic excursions are all part of accepted geophysics.<\/p>\n
Geomagnetic interference is a known risk to modern infrastructure. Grid operators and space weather agencies openly acknowledge that CMEs and GICs (geomagnetically induced currents) pose serious risks to power infrastructure\u2014 especially in areas where the field is weak. That\u2019s literally why countries like the U.S. and UK have mitigation protocols and hardened transformer initiatives.<\/p>\n
Multiple unexplained power disturbances all happening around the same time in weak-field zones is a perfectly reasonable hypothesis. When Spain, Portugal, Bali, and the UK all experience synchronous or sequential grid events, and those regions also correlate to areas of documented magnetic weakening, even a baby expert would include it among potential contributing factors.<\/p>\n They\u2019ll publish overwrought think pieces about the potential dangers of falling gas prices \u2014Could cheap gas destabilize the global economy? Could it ruin the planet? Could it make Trump popular again??\u2014 but when entire continents go dark without explanation, they\u2019ve got nothing to say.<\/p>\n As to this truly existential possibility, the press is as quiet as a Harvard professor when the check comes.<\/p>\n Thanks to media malpractice, most people think only massive solar storms can knock out the power. But the truth is, even minor and unremarkable solar events\u2014like small flares or coronal mass ejections\u2014can wreak havoc if they hit parts of Earth where the magnetic field is weak. That field normally deflects solar energy, but as it thins (which it is doing), more charged particles slip through and induce electric currents in long power lines and transformers<\/p>\n Put simply, long-range transmission lines (common in the U.S., Europe, China, and Australia) act like antennas for geomagnetic currents.<\/p>\n This power instability causes surges and brownouts that can overload grid equipment, trip breakers, and cause widespread blackouts\u2014 even if the weather on the ground is perfectly sunny. Just because experts refuse to talk about this risk, it doesn\u2019t mean it\u2019s not real. It just means they\u2019d rather nobody ask.<\/p>\n The uncontroversial truth is that, if the current magnetic field weakening trend continues \u2014and especially if the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) continues expanding\u2014 the consequences could move from \u201cinconvenient\u201d to catastrophic, and not just for power grids. The SAA already forces satellites to temporarily shut down when passing over it to avoid damage. If it keeps growing (which it is), those shutdowns will spread, and GPS reliability, internet, and military communications will all degrade.<\/p>\n We don\u2019t need to speculate about what happens if there is a big solar storm, or if the poles suddenly switch places. Just the effects we can already see and measure are threatening enough.<\/p>\n If the SAA keeps growing, or if the overall magnetic field keeps weakening, or both, we\u2019re talking about infrastructure risk, biological hazards, and technological vulnerability\u2014 all wrapped in a phenomenon we can\u2019t control and barely even discuss. And yet, media isn\u2019t worried. No headlines. No planning. Just stories about the joys of blackout beer, trust in government, and worrisome falling gas prices.<\/p>\n As always, media\u2019s malpractice on solar threats is about money. If major, observable planetary phenomena \u2014like grid failures, atmospheric disturbances, or warming anomalies\u2014 are credibly linked to natural, planetary-scale forces (like magnetic field shifts or solar cycles), it dilutes the CO2 narrative. As I\u2019ve observed, they can\u2019t regulate the magnetosphere or sell \u2018solar activity\u2019 indulgences.<\/p>\n A declining magnetic field can alter atmospheric circulation, increase cosmic ray influx, and shift cloud formation patterns\u2014 all of which affect climate and weather in ways poorly understood and difficult to model. Acknowledging them would force scientists and officials to say, \u201cActually, there are multiple complex drivers of climate and atmospheric change, some of which we can\u2019t control or predict.\u201d<\/p>\n That\u2019s political heresy. Verboten.<\/p>\n Sadly, they could pivot to focusing on infrastructure resilience instead, and still rake in the money, the regulatory power, and the political points. But they\u2019re too invested in manmade climate theory now. The ossified science establishment doesn\u2019t want to start over. Entrenched climate activists (i.e., successful grifters) fear that a scramble for new positions in a resilience-based science heirarchy might leave them worse off.<\/p>\n We know what we need to do. Our job is to ask so many hard questions they are forced to begin to grapple with the possibilities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This was a part of today’s Jeff Childers Paywalled Coffee and Covid . There is perhaps no more important topic to be aware of so I am posting it here for Goldtenters who are amongst the most “AWARE” people on … Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n