By the way, the concept of a \u201climited hangout\u201d isn\u2019t new, it just has a fancy new name. Kids have been doing it since the invention of the cookie jar. \u201cJunior, did you eat all these cookies after I told you not to touch them?\u201d \u201cDad, I\u2019m sorry, but I only ate one cookie\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Anyway, Bret and Heather noted that Offit just made a huge admission: Pharma did eat one cookie. The spike protein is cytotoxic, and jabbing creates a toxic autoimmune response to healthy heart cells. Bret doesn\u2019t think Dr. Offit made this admission on accident or in good faith. Bret said Offit\u2019s admission was a limited hangout, to soften the blow of people finding out there are unanticipated consequences to the heart from the jabs.<\/p>\n
First, note the shifting narrative on the shots, and how far we have already come:<\/p>\n
Stage 1. The shots are the safest and most effective vaccines in history, a hundred percent.<\/p>\n Stage 2. The shots are safe and effective.<\/p>\n Stage 3. Injuries may occur, but they are very rare.<\/p>\n Stage 4. Injuries occur, but they are rare.<\/p>\n Stage 5. (Where we are now.) The benefits outweigh the risks.<\/strong><\/p>\n But it looks like we might be moving on to the next stage. Bret explained what he thought was the new limited hangout, the new jab narrative:<\/p>\n [Bret:] \u201cNever let a good crisis go to waste\u2026 allowed them to push aside all of the safeguards that should have prevented a prototype technology like this from reaching the market without demonstrating safety. So okay. Pharma accomplished the impossible. They took a product that it owned \u2014 that in my opinion was at least three decades out from being usefully and safely deployable, if at all, there\u2019s no telling whether you could have rescued it. It might have taken three decades for them to figure out how to bring it about and then show that it was safe, and they didn\u2019t want to wait.<\/p>\n Now you have a huge fraction of the globe that has already accepted mRNA vaccine technology. how are you gonna rescue it from a 1 in 35 chance of damaging your heart? How are you going to overcome that this stuff is lethally dangerous, and to tissues you can\u2019t afford to have damaged?\u201d<\/p>\n [Heather:] \u201cBlame the spike protein!\u201d<\/p>\n [Bret:] \u201cRight. If the problem is inherent to the spike protein, then okay, we admit it, we picked the wrong protein, but all you gotta do is pick the right protein that doesn\u2019t have some flaw like this, and the mRNA platform is right back on track.<\/p>\n On the other hand, if we are right \u2026 if it\u2019s both spike is a bad choice, and it doesn\u2019t matter which protein\u2026 Any foreign protein transcribed by your cells is going to cause your own immune system to go after your own heart cells, if that\u2019s where this thing ends up transfecting.\u201d<\/p>\n Gosh. If only someone had warned them the spike protein was a terrible idea to cook into an mRNA injection.<\/p>\n Anyway, if Bret is right, that means Offit was telegraphing a new narrative shift, a shift to Stage 6, to admitting that okay, maybe these jabs are unintentionally dangerous by design, only accidentally, nobody could have seen it coming, but still mRNA in general is a successful platform for vaccines, once you get the spike protein out of the equation.<\/p>\n And Weinstein is saying \u2014 as we\u2019ve been discussing for two years on C&C \u2014 that mRNA is dangerous in general by design because it transfects (infects) healthy cells like heart cells. And then recipients\u2019 immune systems target those formerly-healthy transfected cells for self-destruction. That is called an autoimmunity response, or an injurious immune reaction to self.<\/p>\n It\u2019s almost like injecting people with AIDS or something.<\/p>\n Possibly Offit\u2019s most important admission was, \u201cThere certainly is a causal link between vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis. No doubt about it. The um \u2026 It\u2019s unclear why.\u201d He was careful. He didn\u2019t say how common it was. And he said it was baffling, which means nobody could have seen it coming. Just one of those many unsolved mysteries.<\/p>\n But he admitted it: The vaccines aren\u2019t safe. Nor do they stop covid infections. So they aren\u2019t effective, not really. Sure, the CDC is hanging in there claiming the jabs stop serious covid infections, which aren\u2019t really that serious, as long as you avoid remdesivir and the ventilator. But even that weak claim \u2014 that the jabs prevent serious cases \u2014 remains a baffling mystery, since they have no theory to explain the mechanism for how that preventative feature supposedly works.<\/p>\n Keep your eyes peeled for the coming narrative shift, and don\u2019t get knocked over when the narrative\u2019s boom swings across the S.S. Pandemic.<\/p>\n Coincidentally, the CDC\u2019s current covid advice is \u2026 the same as for treating a cold.<\/p>\n Now, I remember when comparing covid to the flu could get you thrown in social media jail. In fact, that happened to C&C several times. Anyway. Somebody should tell the forever-maskers.<\/p>\n In any event, I do not think it is really a coincidence that the CDC is admitting most people with covid have mild illness and can recover at home. Because if that\u2019s true, what do you need the jabs for?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" JEFF CHILDERS …The Master at spotting Narrative Shifts ………….. This week, \u201cintellectual dark web\u201d member and former professor of evolutionary biology Bret Weinstein podcasted with his wife and fellow evolutionary biologist Heather Heying. In the clip, the couple reviewed another … Continue reading ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/goldtadise.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/cdc-298x300.png\")
<\/a>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/goldtadise.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/cdc1-300x170.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n