In 2020, as people challenged the \u201cexpert guidance\u201d on COVID during the first few months of the pandemic, the use of the term \u201cmisinformation\u201d in news articles almost doubled.<\/p>\n
This rapid increase in the use of the term by legacy media outlets was followed by an equally rapid rollout of new Big Tech misinformation rules which targeted content that questioned the COVID guidance being pushed by authorities.<\/p>\n
Fast forward to 2023 and the first signs of this censorship pattern are starting to play out again.<\/p>\n
The WHO hopes to finalize both instruments by May 2024 and both will be legally binding under international law. The instruments have the full support of the US, Canada, and France.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/opinion\/who-member-pushes-censorship-of-dissenting-voices-in-lead-up-to-pandemic-treaty\/?<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n THE PANDEMIC TREATY IMMEDIATELY STRIPS SOVEREIGN RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION FROM ALL COUNTRIES THAT APPROVE SAME AND TRANSFERS THESE RIGHTS TO THE W.H.O.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty steadily gains approval, members of the global body are calling for further restriction on information which doesn’t align with their narrative. In 2020, as people challenged the \u201cexpert guidance\u201d on COVID during the first few … Continue reading