SIT DOWN WITH A CUP OF JOE AND ABSORB THIS ! From Jeff Childers<\/p>\n
“Things are breaking, they\u2019re breaking big, so keep your eyes open.<\/p>\n
? There was another huge development in the corporate media\u2019s information embargo yesterday, in the form of a UK Telegraph article headlined \u201cLockdown Effects Feared to Be Killing More People Than Covid.\u201d<\/p>\n
Wow.<\/p>\n
And look at the sub-head: \u201cUnexplained excess deaths outstrip those from virus as medics call figures \u2018terrifying\u2019.\u201d In other words, although U.S. corporate media is still ignoring them (with some help from the CDC), excess deaths still just went mainstream.<\/p>\n
Holy Late Arrivals, Batman! Did you ever think you\u2019d see the day? Before we get to the \u201clockdown effects\u201d euphemism, let\u2019s first just consider the profound implications of taking this \u201clockdown effects\u201d nonsense at face value.<\/p>\n
The Telegraph article reported that official UK data \u201csuggests\u201d that \u201cthe effects of lockdown may now be killing more people than are dying of Covid.\u201d That\u2019s not good. It said the paper \u201cunderstands that the Department of Health has ordered an investigation into the figures.\u201d The government will have to blame somebody. Somebody else. Maybe someone who gave it bad advice.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s pretty bad. The paper admitted \u201cthe number of excess deaths not from Covid dwarfs the number linked to the virus.\u201d DWARFS them. People are dying from other things besides covid so much that they DWARF covid deaths. That means it\u2019s SO bad they can\u2019t use any cute non-alarming synonyms anymore. Time for plan B.<\/p>\n
The rest of the article deflects the phenomenon right onto deferred care during lockdowns. That will obscure the real problem for a little while longer, but the \u201cdeferred care\u201d excuse won\u2019t work twelve months from now. It\u2019s a band-aid, and it\u2019s not free. Not even close.<\/p>\n
Even accepting the article\u2019s unlikely premise that \u201clockdown effects\u201d of deferred care ARE the cause of all the unexplained strokes and clots and heart attacks, \u201clockdown effects\u201d reflect awfully on public health agencies. That rationale \u201csuggests\u201d that public health experts failed to consider the now-obvious downstream effects; and worse, anybody with a google terminal will pretty much immediately discover scientists like Bhattacharya, Kulldorf, et al who warned about those very same \u201clockdown effects\u201d back at the time the decisions were made.<\/p>\n
So public health experts won\u2019t be able to say they didn\u2019t know. They just \u201cignored the science,\u201d which is a cardinal sin under Branch Covidia. Once \u201clockdown effects\u201d becomes the default explanation, there will be a massive backlash against public health, for failing to tailor the covid response to account for side effects like deferred care. OF COURSE, it makes NO SENSE to kill more people with mitigations than die from covid, especially when those mitigations have not shown any clear benefit, and especially considering the vast economic and political costs of those mitigations.<\/p>\n
Thanks experts!<\/p>\n
The CDC has withheld the excess death figures in the U.S. for two and a half months now, citing a software upgrade or some equally dumb excuse. Do you suppose it\u2019s possible those numbers, like the UK\u2019s, are so obvious and grim and embarrassing that a \u201ccomplete reorganization\u201d of the CDC would be required, and that, to show fast and effective action, Biden might strip handling pandemics completely away from a disgraced CDC, and re-assign that important job to some other agency?<\/p>\n
Good thing we have one waiting and ready to go! The ASPR. The ASPR wouldn\u2019t have made these kinds of mistakes. It\u2019s not all bureaucratically bloated and packed with political hacks, not like the CDC. No, no, never. ASPR employees don\u2019t care about money and stuff, just helping people. They are the very definition of selfless bureaucrats. You\u2019ll see. So \u2026 problem solved! You\u2019re welcome.<\/p>\n
So, once again we note that the news is not about excess deaths \u2014 we\u2019ve known about THAT for months now \u2014 the news is that the corporate media embargo on TALKING ABOUT excess deaths \u2014 instead of just hoping they\u2019d bugger off \u2014 is all over now. We\u2019ve pivoted into the next narrative.<\/p>\n
The sleight of hand over \u201clockdown effects\u201d causing cancer, heart attacks, and strokes (but not other types of injuries) from \u201cdeferred care\u201d is just a trade-off. They\u2019re throwing public health officials under the bus instead of considering other, more politically difficult causes. Like causes with needles. But it won\u2019t last; it will catch up with them. First of all, public health MIGHT NOT like being thrown under the bus, and MIGHT fight back, but nothing would surprise me from that squad of masochists.<\/p>\n
Second, the \u201cdeferred care\u201d excuse can only last so long before it just doesn\u2019t work anymore. Maybe they are hoping that the excess deaths will resolve by themselves after a while, which could happen; nobody knows. Maybe. But they\u2019ll need to stop jabbing people if they want to find THAT out.<\/p>\n
Oh, wait!<\/p>\n
? The Wall Street Journal ran an exclusive yesterday headlined, \u201cU.S. Plans to Shift Bill for Covid Shots and Treatments to Insurers, Patients.\u201d<\/p>\n
Hahahahaha! They are very clever, you have to hand it to them. How do you phase out the shots without admitting they don\u2019t work, and after getting millions of people hooked on them like strung-out junkies? The answer: Make people pay for them, that\u2019s how! It\u2019s simple economics, supply and demand. Who wants a crappy shot that doesn\u2019t work if you have to PAY FOR IT?<\/strong><\/p>\n Fully’s comment…I challenge anyone to find a funnier and more poignant comment that this Gem from JC…the guy is a GEM \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n Remember: to quell excess deaths \u2014 if the shot is the culprit \u2014 you don\u2019t have to totally eliminate the jabs. You only have to shrink them. Fewer jabs, fewer excess deaths, is how it would work. The numbers will fade into the background. If you can squash next year\u2019s excess deaths, then maybe you COULD shift the blame for the excess deaths onto the public health experts and get away with it.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s how the WSJ describes a very surprising announcement that came out of nowhere with no warning of any kind, and frames it as a natural transition that has been in the works since, well, the beginning:<\/p>\n The Biden administration is planning for an end to its practice of paying for Covid-19 shots and treatments, shifting more control of pricing and coverage to the healthcare industry in ways that could generate sales for companies\u2014and costs for consumers\u2014for years to come\u2026 Both the Trump and Biden administrations always planned to shift the bill for Covid-19 shots and treatments from the federal government to individuals eventually\u2026 \u201cWe\u2019ve known at some point we\u2019d need to move over into the commercial market, and we\u2019re approaching that time now,\u201d said Dawn O\u2019Connell, assistant secretary at HHS for preparedness and response. With Covid-19 cases dropping, more activities resuming and funding for the pandemic response running short, officials are now working to map out that transition\u2026 You literally cannot make this stuff up. I think they\u2019re making it up as they go along at this point.<\/p>\n ? Here\u2019s a hot take. If I\u2019m right, and if Big Pharma, along with its wholly-owned subsidiary \u2014 corporate media \u2014 begin to throw public health under the lockdown bus for this, we should go ahead and let them. Have fun down there! There\u2019s zero reason to defend public health after they dictated and demonized us all. They\u2019re big boys and girls (often literally) so they can fight their own battles.<\/p>\n We needed to clear out public health anyway. This could help do it a lot faster. We\u2019ll get to pharma later.<\/p>\n And, what does the expression, \u201cuseful idiots\u201d mean? I think public health folks might be about to find out.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" SIT DOWN WITH A CUP OF JOE AND ABSORB THIS ! From Jeff Childers “Things are breaking, they\u2019re breaking big, so keep your eyes open. ? There was another huge development in the corporate media\u2019s information embargo yesterday, in the … Continue reading
\nWell, sure. But do you think that jab lovers really understood it meant anytime soon? The Journal claims the BUDGET is the problem; the shots are just too expensive, nobody\u2019s got the cash:<\/p>\n
\nThis kind of shines a new light on the CDC\u2019s recent announcement that unjabbed people should be treated the same as jabbed, doesn\u2019t it? I mean, you can\u2019t treat unjabbed people like scabby lepers and not offer them free shots. But if you treat everybody all the same, the problem is neatly solved. Kudos!<\/p>\n