The Headline in this Study out of the UK says <\/p>\n
“Infection Rates 3 Times Lower for Double Vaccinated”<\/strong><\/p>\n Sounds Good Right ? BUT read the article and see a few thing that are NOT headlined<\/p>\n ……………………….<\/p>\n 1….The Vaccines are NOT 95% effective…they are 49% Effective<\/strong> ! 2…All of a sudden they are playing with cycle thresholds to come to their conclusions ( first time I have seen any mention of cycle thresholds in a MSM study )<\/p>\n Note they are admitting anything found OVER 27 Cycles is a “weak” positive ! They have Inadvertently and Absolutely admitted here that “Case” numbers ” 200 Million cases in the world are Overstated by A LOT…conservatively by a factor of 10 I would guesstimate !!…So we can absolutely mark that down to 20 Million cases worldwide for starters<\/strong><\/p>\n ……………………………..<\/p>\n 3…This Headlined.. 3 Times Better for Double Vaxxed compared to Non Vaxxed is “Relative Efficacy”<\/strong><\/p>\n To explain …look at the numbers cited<\/p>\n “Data suggests the prevalence among unvaccinated participants was at 1.21 percent, three-fold greater comparing to the prevalence among vaccinated participants (0.4 percent).”<\/p>\n Therefore The Absolute Efficacy is .81 % (1.21 – .40)<\/p>\n Here is the Crux :<\/p>\n There were almost 100,000 people in the study and 527 people tested positive for an overall positivity rate of .68<\/p>\n Thats 1 in 160 people tested randomly who were positive…Hardly Epidemic Proportions<\/strong><\/p>\n The Point is , in Absolute terms , the chance of an Individual Unvaxxed Person getting a Positive test is .8% higher than if he was double vaxxed.<\/p>\n Here is the article…please correct me if I a misinterpreting !<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/mkt_breakingnews\/uk-study-says-ccp-virus-infection-rates-3-times-lower-for-double-vaccinated_3917142.html?utm_source=News&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-08-05-2&mktids=655d3dd4735eca78643a59602d8831a3&est=5ycA9S8mL1iHTQHB3DqEkg1d1NyNTwqslIA7Rsoq5lQCmtKxAgCSrA%3D%3D<\/a><\/p>\n Of course THEY will want to use this to Push More Vaccines ! BUT now You Know it’s BS<\/p>\n PS I am NOT a Statistician but I do have a Statistical Bullshit detector .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Headline in this Study out of the UK says “Infection Rates 3 Times Lower for Double Vaccinated” Sounds Good Right ? BUT read the article and see a few thing that are NOT headlined ………………………. 1….The Vaccines are NOT … Continue reading
\n………………………<\/p>\n
\nNo mention of the fact that for over a year and a half these tests were run up to 45 cycles ( Millions of times more amplification than 27 cycles)<\/p>\n