Loading ...BREAKING: ENORMOUS development as President Trump reveals they are VERY CLOSE to peace with Russia-Ukraine, and a trilateral meeting might happen soon
Trump is deploying Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with VLADIMIR PUTIN in Moscow, and Army Sec. Driscoll to Ukraine
THIS IS HUGE!
“I look forward to hopefully meeting with President Zelenskyy and President Putin soon, but ONLY when the deal to end this War is FINAL or, in its final stages. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter, and let’s all hope that PEACE can be accomplished AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!”
BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS! Keep pushing
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1993403848900096347
………
HA..NOTICE WHO IS NOT AT THE TABLE….MAYBE LOOK UNDER THE BUS
https://goldtadise.com/?p=681822#comments
Clandestine
@WarClandestine
·
3h
Outlets are reporting that Ukraine have agreed to a peace deal brokered by the Trump administration, but are still sorting out some minor details.
The deal is reportedly favorable to Russia and Ukraine will have to give up territory.
Sounds promising
https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1993349437700423790
US Meets Russia Budanov UAE; Russia Rejects Outright EU Plan Reaffirms SMO Goals Storms Huiliaipole – The DURAN
https://rumble.com/v728g6o-us-meets-russia-budanov-uae-russia-rejects-outright-eu-plan-reaffirms-smo-g.html?
First 31 minutes ……..
THINGS MOVING FAST…THIS IS HOURS OLD
MINUTES AGO
How many DC sewer rats are working overtime to undermine Trump?
They want ANYTHING but peace.
“with additional input from both sides” — I believe this means input between US and Ukraine.
Russia is stating (see Lavrov) that they have NOT been involved and have NOT been presented with ANY official US plan — and their Alaskan position is unchanged!
There “SEEMS” to be efforts underway to create a scenario where the narrative will be that Russia has “walked” from a deal, when in fact Russia has NOT yet been involved in same.
This of course is semantics and the statement by Trump would be read by most people as “input between Russia and USA” which is not the case. So is DJT playing a mental game of words OR was he specifically talking about USA and Ukraine — the context is ambiguous!
IMO …THE DURAN BOYS…AS GOOD AS THEY HAVE BEEN….DO NOT WANT THE UKIE WAR TO END…THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY BIASED…PRO RUSSIAN AND ANTI GLOBALIST BUT ALSO ANTI TRUMP…THEY CONSIDER HIN A BUFFOON
ALSO THEIR BUSINESS MODEL IS WAR….SPECIFICALLY UKRAINE WAR…WITHOUT WAR THEY WIOLL LOSE EYEBALLS
Armstrong had gotten called in for his input a bit ago,
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/trumps-28-point-peace-plan/
Russia has stated that they have NOT yet received any official peace plan for review. They consider the Alaskan agreements to be the template for further negotiations.
That doesn’t mean they won’t shift to incorporate Armstrong’s ideas but rather that they have not received an official US written offer.
Ukraine agrees to peace proposal, with only “minor details” to settle, official says, but no word from Russia
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-war-peace-deal-trump-driscoll-abu-dhabi-talks-latest/
It is easier for allies to agree amongst themselves re: peace proposals and/or ceasefires when the ONLY discussions being held are between themselves.
Russia communicated (as of this morning) that they have NOT YET been given ANY official peace proposal (neither the 28 point nor the 18 point plans) — so they have no comment to make as they have not been involved – period full stop!
They have also clearly indicated that any deviation from the Alaskan agreement (that they deem as completed with the US) is unacceptable and will be rejected (Putin’s speech 2 days ago).
EU / Ukraine and it appears USA are NOT willing to stand by the Alaskan agreement and an attempt is CLEARLY underway to position public opinion that the Russians are to blame — however — the Russians are also using PR’s to confirm that they have NOT been involved and that they consider THE deal framework was finalized at the Alaskan meetings.
Perhaps what we are witnessing is merely a pre-planned theatrical performance that is meant to convince western citizens that NATO should move to WWIII — hence the vague or semantic PR’s to soften up the populace? The next step might well be a false flag event to push this decision over the edge.
DJT wants to be perceived as The Peace Maker but coming to agreement without involving the “enemy” only offers the opportunity for smoke and mirrors!
Everybody SHOULD want peace and the killing to stop — 25000 sounds realistic — but he will NOT be allowed (politically) to leave NATO NOR stop the weapons supply NOR stop financing the war — perhaps this is WHY this storyline is being created now — in advance of the APRIL 2026 rumoured timeline.
Very sad for the warriors of Ukraine — Poland has been positioned to be next……
The Russians basically wrote the “Trump” 28 point peace Plan and this is still a negotiation
Ukraine backed by their handlers then respond with what their best position is within that framework…Now back to the Russians for their next response
Yes Russia is in the drivers seat but there will be some compromise if they are willing to end the carnage
No matter what they are infinitely closer to a deal than ever
FGC — I truly do hope you are correct and that I am terribly wrong on the sequence of events. There is NO QUESTION that the Russians perceive the basis for a potential end to the war WAS AGREED TO IN ALASKA — but it is not the 28 point peace plan being bantied back and forth between USA and Ukraine.
It is also the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Lavrov and Putin and Peskov said in the videos released to counter the PR’s/news coming out of the west. Both videos have been posted at the tent.
You/I and most of the tent are IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT with the desired end result — to see the killing stop and the genocide to end — but we are mere vessels presenting the information that comes to us. We ALL want DJT to succeed………
At the speed this is moving, we shall soon see IF a formal proposal is made to Russia and how they then react.
BTW – LAVROV posted a second video (may or may not have added it to the tent) where he states that “professionalism” demands that terms/contents of discussions should NOT be made public until all negotiations have been completed. I believe his point was that average citizens of the world should not know ANYTHING about any negotiations underway or positions of the parties involved. He basically was suggesting that the west is trying to negotiate through the legacy media and Russia isn’t interested in this tactic. In LAVROV’s terms, we (the ordinary citizen) shouldn’t know anything about ANY plan before it is finalized. Obviously what is happening here does not meet this criteria.
Good Point K2