Goldtent TA Paradise

Rapppoppporttt asking what we’re asking

1. Fullgoldcrown says:

   October 3, 2025 - 3:58 pm at 3:58 pm

   There is no “Official Story ” Mr Rappaport

   The gun thing the bullet thing and all the other things are just hearsay and assumptions based on initial reports from those at the scene and people who are speculating. The hand signal thing has been debunked even before the report for instance . The Prosecutors claim to the court to have “piles” of evidence … .but YOU nor no one else has a clue what that evidence is…it’s not been published because it’s evidence in a trial .

   So keep trolling for eyeballs but if you were a real sincere journalist you would wait for the official report before you started to take it all apart…which no matter what it is you will do your darndest to do

   How the heel do these idiots critique a report that has not been reported yet ?

   sheesh

2. pedro_deleon says:

   October 3, 2025 - 4:12 pm at 4:12 pm

   There is no “Official Story”

   Not yet, but I’ve seen nothing from Patel suggesting any serious consideration of Alternative Scenarios.

   And there ARE questions. Many, in fact.
   AND THAT’S THE POINT HERE.

   Don’t let anyone sweep this under the rug.

   From one of my sources, citing to (approved dissemination of) parts of a report by ONE three letter agency analysis team:

   ‘The single fired offending round was a small-caliber very-high velocity round which is a penetrator bullet covered in a hard-gel kinetic saboted casing.’

   That means the 30-06 RIFLE MAY still be part of the story, but it would be FAR from customary because the shell itself WAS NOT.

3. Marcusjames says:

   October 3, 2025 - 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm

   It’s easy to see he didn’t disassemble the rifle. You can see him carrying it underneath a dark towel as he then jumps down with it from off of the roof. Pretty obvious. What else could it be?