Does the Moon Reflect the Suns Light?
The other day I posted a personal observation I had made about the Sun. In simple words I was stating that in order to locate where the Sun lies physically would only require us to trace its light beams back to their source using basic geometry. The angles of the suns light reaching Earth were more than sufficient information to allow us to calculate how high the Sun was in our sky.
That was the smoking gun detail that it is the Sun that is circling the Earth, not the other way around.
Today I thought I would tackle another of my basic observations. These are things I have noted on my own over the years, incidentally. I have not been told these facts by anyone else and as far as I can tell nobody ever discusses them. So what has been asserted that I am challenging, is that the Moon reflects its light from the Sun. Without a Sun and its great glow we might not see the moon at all (in theory).
That assertion is plain wrong and I can prove it.
The reason I say this is because of the relative brightness of our Lunar companion. We can literally read a book by it during its fullness as it bathes the Earths surface in its night time glow. And when we look skyward we can see a moon that is evenly shining in light from one edge to another. I mean to say, there is very little difference in the brightness of the moon at its edges versus its center. All of it appears equally bright all at once. But that is not how reflected light is supposed to look when its flowing off a ball shaped satellite.
So this is about the physics of light and how much light should reach the eye of the observer when the source is different than the reflected surface that is being observed. I am going to avoid getting geeky and doing physics at this point. Its sufficient to say that light bouncing off a ball shape can never and will never appear to the viewer as an evenly reflective surface. There is always a hot spot since light bounces back perpendicular to its source whereas the rest of the light does so in gradations of diffusion and scattered rays. The image in my post makes the point easy to understand. See the bright spot?
So when you look up in the sky and see a full moon equally lit across its entire surface you are not looking at reflected light. You are looking at a ball that is actually its own light source. That is the only conclusion that can be drawn since the only other option was that the Moon is being lit by light reflecting from Earth. But of course that situation would still have to follow the same physics as the Sun being the original light source. And since the Sun is ruled out as the Moons light source we only have moon lighting to work with unless the Moon is made of plasma as some people assert.
But the Suns lighting has little or nothing to do with what you are viewing on a brightly lit moon.

Brilliant Observation Sir Farmer
Would you say that The “Scientists” have been “Gaslighting” us about the nature of our reality ?
Farmers Law 🙂
I hear some are saying there is no more Original Thinking allowed here at Goldtent….so what do you think you are doing making “observations” 🙂
Absolutely. Not sure if gaslighting is the right term but we have been indoctrinated by the billions for decades on end. Its really unprecedented. I have seen quite a few claims to the words “biggest lie ever told” but none can compete with how misdirected children all over the world have become on the topic of the solar system and Earth. I am stumped as to why its been done though and in wonder about who really benefits. Strangely, the same process is taking place everywhere on the planet at once in classrooms from Europe to China and America to Zimbabwe. We are being trained to not understand and taught to not observe.
Question : So how do we explain the Phases of the moon from Full Moon to new Moon
I suppose this is a phenomena of where the moon is in it’s cycle around the Earth ?
My take:
The reason that light on the Moon appears uniform is that the Sun is so far away that it’s light beams are parallel and cover the Moon uniformly.
Using a local light source and a ball is not the same thing, since most lights would have a point source, and the ball is not far from the source, the light rays are not parallel, so the centre of the ball would appear brighter since it is relatively closer tho the light source and receives more light.
If I removed the moon ball and replaced it with a flat mirror you would instantly appreciate that its the receiving surface that matters in the discussion of reflections.
The receiving surface determines the amount of reflection, absorption, and diffusion of the incoming light, and this reflection also depends on the source – whether a point of light or parallel light rays.
I’m on a train – is the earth moving under me or am I moving over the earth?
If the perception of all mankind were to suddenly vanish, would what an astronaut once observed from their capsule also cease to exist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH2w6Oxx0kQ
Why do so few humans ‘believe’ the fruits of their labor are disappearing and turn to a shiny object, while the vast majority have no clue.
But of course some of those same few may have a substance abuse problem.
THERE IS A REALITY independent of our perception on a whole host of topics.
On the topic of light source.
If the moon is it’s own light source, why isn’t it always a full moon?
The ‘hot spot’ as it were, is due to the properties of the surface reflecting the sun’s light. I believe if I shine a light on a black marble or a ball of black yarn I won’t get the same effect and I’ve yet to see a hot spot of the earth as viewed from space (if humans can actually get that high).
Great question YYZ. I will admit that I do not know the answer to why if the moon is its own light source then why its not always full. That is because I cannot explain what is causing a shadow on the moon during its phases. Fully was asking a similar question and I was stumped. But here is a clue. We are able to see both the Sun and Moon in the same sky frequently and not just on Full and New Moons. The one in this video is an example.
What this proves is that the Earth is not what is causing the shadow to fall across the moon as we are being told. It can’t be because there is still a shadow yet both the Sun and Moon are visible together. I mean to say, should the Earth not be between them in order to get a shadow cast? If this happened even once it would be noteworthy and demand a serious scientific inquiry. But it happens many times each month and nobody serious even comments on it! Nobody from the observatories either.
The Sun and a half moon seen in the same sky together.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw4sRNYlB4s&t=44s
Yes, an oddity I hadn’t considered.
I did find this in the comments section insightful though.
“You need to realize that the Sun is not the same distance away as the Moon. Try to visualize the Sun being extremely far away and casting light on the Moon from an angle.
If the Earth were flat, the Moon should look full.”
A part of the earth (much larger than the moon**) is in fact between the sun and moon even though they can be seen in the same sky.
Say you have a light bulb 10 feet in diameter that is 30 feet away from a large marble (Taw) that has a BB spinning around it (the marble) in a 2 inch radius. If a view from the marble could see both the bulb and BB in the same radius of vision, with the marble so close to the BB, it would seem reasonable that a portion of the marble could still partially obfuscate the view of the BB.
** Granted, regarding size and distance, I’m making some acknowledgements/assumptions to what I’ve been taught my entire life (I’m not an astronaut), but I do think that video is consistent with observations from earth if those distance/size dimensions are true.