Go to his twitter feed for the full links and citations

TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2

My suspicious cat instinct now leans toward the U.S. intel community releasing the virus in Wuhan intentionally, knowing it would travel to the U.S. and give them plausible deniability. Why else would the Pentagon give China the keys to a biological weapon? pic.twitter.com/Arhx4Mzvrc

2. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses. January 9, 2017: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2017/01/0…

3. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false.

4. In the original guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was a footnote that everyone seems to have missed: See Page 2 phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Doc… pic.twitter.com/nCqVsEqUDo

5. This exception essentially permitted the Pentagon to continue funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security.

6. Which is exactly what the defense department did: “Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020” dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…

7. Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China.

8. Why would the U.S. be handing China keys to a biological weapon? Why would we be funding that research in Wuhan, knowing the CCP would known of, and be in control over, the research?

9. 2014 through 2017 – There are political and ideological benefits from the perspective of Obama’s ideological group for unleashing the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic as an opportunistic “crisis” to create totalitarian government solutions regardless of who was in office.
pic.twitter.com/brHGrhCv2y